The argument par excellence against the united states working toward disarmament is that this policy might lead some us allies to seek their own nuclear weapons implicit in this argument is the assertion that working toward disarmament involves ignoring the concerns of allies. Arguments for nuclear abolition the humanitarian case the abolition of nuclear weapons is an urgent humanitarian necessity any use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic consequences. If nations fail to eliminate their nuclear weapon arsenals, then it is likely to result in proliferation of nuclear weapons to dangerous countries the argument that powerful nations should protect themselves with powerful weapons will surely lead to less powerful nations will make that argument as well.
Six deceptive arguments against a nuclear weapons ban should we still strive for a world without nuclear weapons, despite global security concerns absolutely, writes cesar jaramillo, as he debunks the justifications for not taking current negotiations seriously.
The nuclear weapons debate refers to the controversies surrounding the threat, 1982, when one million people demonstrated in new york city against nuclear weapons in october 1983, arguments under the scenario of total multilateral disarmament,.
Obviously, one of the main arguments against the possession and use of nuclear weapons is their devastating effect on both the people and the environment so far, the only use of nuclear weapons for the purpose of warfare was the usa's use of atomic bombs in japan during the events of world war 2.